Establishment and Constitution of the Supreme Court
Official heading: “Establishment and constitution of the Supreme Court”
- Source edition
- The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
- Source locator
- Part V, Article 124, printed pages 57–58
- Last human source-link check
- Not yet checked
- Last human legal review
- Not yet reviewed
AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.
1. In One Sentence
Article 124 establishes the Supreme Court of India, determines judicial qualifications and tenure until age sixty-five, and prescribes the strict impeachment procedure for removal on grounds of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
2. What It Means in Everyday Language
Article 124 is the foundational charter of the Supreme Court of India as the apex constitutional court of the nation. It originally provided for a Chief Justice and seven other judges, empowering Parliament to prescribe a larger number by law (increased to 33 other judges by the 2019 amendment act).
Clause (2) provides that every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President and hold office until attaining the age of sixty-five years. While the 99th Amendment (2014) introduced text referring to the NJAC, the Supreme Court in the landmark SCAORA judgment (2015) declared that amendment unconstitutional, reviving the collegium and consultation system as operative law.
Clause (3) prescribes strict eligibility criteria: a candidate must be an Indian citizen and must have been for at least five years a High Court Judge, or for at least ten years an advocate of a High Court, or be in the opinion of the President a distinguished jurist.
Clauses (4) and (5) guarantee tenure security through a rigorous removal procedure: a Judge can only be removed by an order of the President passed after an address by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership and a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting, on grounds of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
Clause (7) permanently debars retired Supreme Court judges from pleading or acting in any court or before any authority within India, protecting judicial impartiality.
3. Practical Illustrative Example
A controversial executive order seeks to unilaterally dismiss a sitting Supreme Court judge over an unpopular constitutional verdict.
4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions
Article 124 establishes the apex court and guarantees institutional independence through high appointment thresholds and near-impenetrable tenure security.
- Retirement age fixed at sixty-five years.
- Appointment via constitutional collegium/consultation framework.
- Stringent qualifications: High Court bench experience, legal practice, or distinguished jurist.
- Rigorous impeachment barrier: Requires special majorities in both Houses in the same session.
- Post-retirement bar on domestic legal practice.
5. Operative Constitutional Text
6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations
Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.
- •Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part V, Article 124, printed pages 57–58 • Human source-link check pending
Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.
