Skip to main content

Article 211

Restriction on Discussion in State Legislature

Official heading: “Restriction on discussion in the Legislature.”

Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part VI, Article 211, printed page 97
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Article 211 imposes an absolute constitutional prohibition on discussing the judicial conduct of any Supreme Court or High Court judge in the State Legislature.

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

Article 211 secures the absolute independence of the higher judiciary from political attacks and pressure within State Legislatures.

Total Bar: The text provides unequivocally: "No discussion shall take place in the Legislature of a State with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties."

Stricter than Parliament: At the Union level, Article 121 permits discussion on a judge's conduct when a motion for impeachment is actively under consideration in Parliament. In contrast, State Legislatures have NO impeachment powers whatsoever; therefore, Article 211 contains no exceptions and imposes an absolute, unconditional bar on judicial criticism.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

An MLA is outraged by a High Court judgment striking down a State quota policy and attempts to introduce a motion criticizing the integrity of the judge.

Core takeaway: Under Article 211, the Speaker must instantly disallow the motion; State Legislatures are constitutionally forbidden from discussing judicial conduct.
Illustrative Notice: While an MLA enjoys legislative freedom of speech under Article 194, that freedom is expressly subject to Article 211.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 211 insulates the higher judiciary from State legislative encroachment.

  • Absolute, unconditional ban on discussing judicial conduct.
  • Applies to both Supreme Court and High Court judges.
  • Stricter than parliamentary rule (Article 121) because States hold no removal jurisdiction.
  • Direct constitutional limit on freedom of speech under Article 194(1).

5. Operative Constitutional Text

No discussion shall take place in the Legislature of a State with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties.
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part VI, Article 211, printed page 97 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: