Skip to main content

Article 228

Transfer of Certain Cases to High Court

Official heading: “Transfer of certain cases to High Court.”

Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part VI, Article 228, printed pages 106–107
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Article 228 mandates the High Court to withdraw and determine cases pending in subordinate courts that involve a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution.

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

Article 228 ensures that constitutional questions of general importance are adjudicated by the State's highest constitutional court rather than by subordinate magistrates or civil judges.

Mandatory Transfer: If the High Court is satisfied that a case pending in a subordinate court involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution whose determination is necessary for the disposal of the case, the High Court shall withdraw the case.

Two Options for Disposal: Upon withdrawing the case, the High Court may either: (a) dispose of the case itself completely; or (b) determine the constitutional question of law and return the case to the subordinate court with a copy of its judgment, directing the lower court to dispose of the suit in conformity with that constitutional ruling.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

In an ordinary civil contract dispute before a civil judge, the defendant challenges the constitutional validity of a newly amended State tenancy enactment.

Core takeaway: Under Article 228, the High Court withdraws the case to decide the constitutional validity of the statute, preventing inconsistent rulings by subordinate judges.
Illustrative Notice: The constitutional question must be necessary for deciding the case; hypothetical or academic points do not justify withdrawal.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 228 centralizes constitutional interpretation in the High Court.

  • Mandatory withdrawal when constitutional question is necessary for case disposal.
  • Prevents conflicting constitutional interpretations across subordinate courts.
  • High Court can either decide the full case or remit with binding legal ruling.
  • Parallels Supreme Court withdrawal powers under Article 139A.

5. Operative Constitutional Text

If the High Court is satisfied that a case pending in a court subordinate to it involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of this Constitution the determination of which is necessary for the disposal of the case, it shall withdraw the case and may— (a) either dispose of the case itself, or (b) determine the said question of law and return the case to the court from which the case has been so withdrawn together with a copy of its judgment on such question, and the said court shall on receipt thereof proceed to dispose of the case in conformity with such judgment.
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part VI, Article 228, printed pages 106–107 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: