Skip to main content

Article 238

Provisions as to States in Part B of the First Schedule (Omitted)

Official heading: “[The States in Part B of the First Schedule].”

Historical / Omitted Provision

Article 238 applied the general constitutional machinery of Part VI (The States) to Part B States (former princely states and unions such as Hyderabad, Mysore, and Travancore-Cochin) with specific modifications regarding the Rajpramukh. Following the reorganization of Indian States on a linguistic basis in 1956 and the abolition of the distinction between Part A and Part B States, the entire Part VII containing Article 238 was omitted.

Amendment: Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956 (s. 29 and Sch.)Effective Date: 01-11-1956Modern Constitutional Status: Omitted from the operative Constitution. The distinction between Part A and Part B States was abolished by the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, unifying the constitutional framework of Indian States under Part VI.
Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part VII, Article 238, printed page 114
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Article 238 formerly adapted the governance framework of Part VI to Part B States headed by a Rajpramukh, and was omitted when state categories were unified in 1956.

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

At the commencement of the Constitution in 1950, Indian States were classified into Part A, Part B, Part C, and Part D territories.

Part B States were formed by integrating former princely states and unions. Article 238 adapted the provisions of Part VI (which applied to Part A States) to Part B States, replacing references to the Governor with the "Rajpramukh".

The States Reorganisation Act, 1956, and the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, abolished the distinction between Part A and Part B States, creating a unified category of States and Union Territories. Consequently, Part VII and Article 238 were omitted from the operative Constitution.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

A student reading constitutional history wonders why states like Mysore or Hyderabad had Rajpramukhs rather than Governors between 1950 and 1956.

Core takeaway: Article 238 provided the interim constitutional arrangement for those former princely unions until their full integration and equalization with other States in 1956.
Illustrative Notice: Article 238 has no operative legal force today; all States in India are governed equally under Part VI of the Constitution.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 238 is a historical provision omitted in 1956.

  • Omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956 (w.e.f. 1 November 1956).
  • Eliminated the constitutional office of Rajpramukh in favour of Governors appointed under Article 153.
  • Unified Indian federal structure into States and Union Territories.

5. Historical constitutional wording — not operative

[The States in Part B of the First Schedule].—Omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part VII, Article 238, printed page 114 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: