Skip to main content

Article 285

Exemption of Union Property from State Taxation

Official heading: “Exemption of property of the Union from State taxation”

Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part XII, Article 285, printed page 168
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Exempts property of the Union from all taxes imposed by a State or local authority, save to the extent Parliament permits by law.

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

Article 285 embodies the doctrine of intergovernmental tax immunity: the property of the Central Government is immune from taxation by States and local municipal bodies.

Clause (1) provides that property belonging to the Union of India is exempt from all taxes imposed by a State or by any authority within a State (such as municipal property taxes, water taxes, or conservancy charges), unless Parliament passes a law explicitly permitting such taxation.

Clause (2) provides a grandfather exception: if a specific Union property was already liable to a local tax immediately before 26 January 1950, that pre-existing tax can continue to be levied until Parliament by law otherwise provides.

In landmark rulings, the Supreme Court has clarified that Article 285 protects property owned directly by the Union (e.g., railway tracks, central government office buildings, post offices), but does NOT protect separate statutory government corporations or public sector undertakings (like Air India, BHEL, or nationalized banks), whose property is legally distinct from the Union.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

A municipal corporation demands property tax on a Central Government railway station and a cantonment headquarters building.

Core takeaway: Under Article 285(1), the railway station and military headquarters are exempt from municipal property taxes because they are direct property of the Union.
Illustrative Notice: The municipality can bill the Union for specific service charges (such as actual water consumption or sewerage treatment) under contractual arrangements, but cannot levy an ad valorem property tax.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 285 protects central sovereign assets from decentralized state taxation.

  • Complete property immunity: Union property cannot be taxed by States, municipalities, or panchayats.
  • Parliamentary override power: Parliament can pass a statute permitting local taxation of specified Union assets.
  • Corporate distinction: Government companies and statutory corporations do not enjoy Article 285 tax immunity.

5. Operative Constitutional Text

(1) The property of the Union shall, save in so far as Parliament may by law otherwise provide, be exempt from all taxes imposed by a State or by any authority within a State. (2) Nothing in clause (1) shall, until Parliament by law otherwise provides, prevent any authority within a State from levying any tax on any property of the Union to which such property was immediately before the commencement of this Constitution liable or treated as liable, so long as that tax continues to be levied in that State.
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part XII, Article 285, printed page 168 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: