Skip to main content

Article 317

Constitutional Safeguards and Supreme Court Inquiry for Removal of PSC Members

Official heading: “Removal and suspension of a member of a Public Service Commission”

Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part XIV, Article 317, printed page 179
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Mandates that PSC members can only be removed by the President for misbehaviour following a formal Supreme Court inquiry, or summarily for insolvency, paid outside employment, or infirmity.

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

To safeguard their independence, members of both Union and State Public Service Commissions cannot be dismissed at the whim of the executive.

For alleged misbehaviour, removal can only occur by Presidential order after the Supreme Court conducts a judicial inquiry under Article 145 and recommends removal.

During the Supreme Court inquiry, the President (for UPSC/Joint Commission) or the Governor (for State Commission) may suspend the member.

Under clause (3), the President may directly remove a member without a Supreme Court inquiry if the member is adjudged insolvent, accepts outside paid employment, or suffers from infirmity of mind or body.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

A State government becomes dissatisfied with the State PSC Chairman and attempts to pass an executive order terminating their appointment.

Core takeaway: The order is unconstitutional. Even for a State Commission, only the President can remove a member, and only after a formal inquiry and report by the Supreme Court.
Illustrative Notice: The State Governor has only the interim power to suspend a State Commission member while the Supreme Court inquiry is pending.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 317 provides robust quasi-judicial independence to Public Service Commission members.

  • Exclusive Presidential removal: Only the President—never a State Governor—has the power to order removal.
  • Mandatory Supreme Court reference: Misbehaviour removals require an inquiry and report by the Supreme Court under Article 145.
  • Summary disqualifications: Clause (3) permits immediate removal for insolvency, outside paid work, or physical/mental incapacity.
  • Deemed misbehaviour: Private financial interest in government contracts constitutes deemed misbehaviour under clause (4).

5. Operative Constitutional Text

(1) Subject to the provisions of clause (3), the Chairman or any other member of a Public Service Commission shall only be removed from his office by order of the President on the ground of misbehaviour after the Supreme Court, on reference being made to it by the President, has, on inquiry held in accordance with the procedure prescribed in that behalf under article 145, reported that the Chairman or such other member, as the case may be, ought on any such ground to be removed. (2) The President, in the case of the Union Commission or a Joint Commission, and the Governor in the case of a State Commission, may suspend from office the Chairman or any other member of the Commission in respect of whom a reference has been made to the Supreme Court under clause (1) until the President has passed orders on receipt of the report of the Supreme Court on such reference. (3) Notwithstanding anything in clause (1), the President may by order remove from office the Chairman or any other member of a Public Service Commission if the Chairman or such other member, as the case may be,— (a) is adjudged an insolvent; or (b) engages during his term of office in any paid employment outside the duties of his office; or (c) is, in the opinion of the President, unfit to continue in office by reason of infirmity of mind or body. (4) If the Chairman or any other member of a Public Service Commission is or becomes in any way concerned or interested in any contract or agreement made by or on behalf of the Government of India or the Government of a State or participates in any way in the profit thereof or in any benefit or emolument arising therefrom otherwise than as a member and in common with the other members of an incorporated company, he shall, for the purposes of clause (1), be deemed to be guilty of misbehaviour.
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part XIV, Article 317, printed page 179 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: