Skip to main content

Article 31D

Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities [Omitted]

Official heading: “Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities”

Historical / Omitted Provision

Inserted by the 42nd Amendment during the 1975–77 Internal Emergency to immunize laws against anti-national activities and associations from challenges under Articles 14, 19, or 31; omitted by the 43rd Amendment to restore constitutional safeguards over speech, assembly, and political associations.

Amendment: Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977 (Section 2)Effective Date: 13 April 1978
Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part III, Article 31D, printed page 18
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Article 31D was an emergency-era provision creating sweeping immunity for anti-national activity laws against Fundamental Rights; it was swiftly omitted by Parliament in 1977.

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

Introduced during the Internal Emergency by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, Article 31D sought to immunize laws dealing with "anti-national activities" or "anti-national associations" from challenge under Articles 14, 19, or 31.

Because the definition of "anti-national activity" was extraordinarily broad and vulnerable to executive abuse against political dissent, the incoming Parliament promptly omitted the provision through the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977.

Article 31D is an important historical landmark illustrating how emergency encroachments on fundamental liberties were constitutionally repealed.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

A citizen is accused under public safety legislation during peaceful political advocacy.

Core takeaway: The State cannot rely on Article 31D to shield arbitrary restrictions from judicial review under Article 14 or Article 19, because Article 31D was completely omitted in 1978.
Illustrative Notice: Ordinary preventive detention and criminal statutes still exist, but must strictly conform to Article 19(2)-(6), Article 21, and Article 22.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 31D is completely deleted from the Constitution.

  • Omitted by section 2 of the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, w.e.f. 13 April 1978.
  • Has no legal force or operative application in Indian law.
  • Historical reminder of the resilience of constitutional democracy in restoring fundamental rights.

5. Historical constitutional wording — not operative

[Article 31D. Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities.] Omitted by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 2 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part III, Article 31D, printed page 18 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: