Skip to main content

Article 356

President’s Rule: Failure of Constitutional Machinery and Judicial Review

Official heading: “Provisions in case of failure of constitutional machinery in States”

Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part XVIII, Article 356, printed pages 211–214
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Authorizes the President to assume the functions of a State government and dissolve or suspend the Assembly if constitutional governance breaks down, subject to strict judicial review.

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

Article 356 provides for "President’s Rule" when the constitutional machinery in a State breaks down.

If the President, on receipt of a report from the Governor or otherwise, is satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the government of the State cannot be carried on in accordance with the Constitution, the President may assume state executive functions and declare that the powers of the State Legislature shall be exercised by Parliament.

Dr. B. R. Ambedkar famously hoped that Article 356 would remain a "dead letter" to be used only in the rarest of rare emergencies. However, after decades of political misuse, the landmark nine-judge bench in S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) placed strict constitutional constraints:

Bommai established that presidential proclamations under Article 356 are subject to judicial review; the Legislative Assembly cannot be dissolved until Parliament approves the proclamation; and courts can revive a dismissed state government if the invocation was mala fide or unconstitutional.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

Following state elections, no political party can form a stable coalition, multiple votes of no-confidence fail, and the state budget cannot be passed.

Core takeaway: Article 356 allows President’s Rule to be imposed due to genuine constitutional stalemate, placing administration under the Governor.
Illustrative Notice: Under the Bommai doctrine, central authorities cannot impose President’s Rule merely because a different political party won power at the Centre.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 356 is a dramatic federal mechanism governed by stringent judicial checks.

  • Ground of invocation: Strictly limited to situations where governance cannot proceed in accordance with the Constitution.
  • Two-month parliamentary approval: Proclamation ceases after two months unless approved by both Houses of Parliament.
  • Maximum duration: Cannot exceed three years in total, with special approval conditions required beyond one year.
  • Bommai safeguards: Subject to judicial review; improper dissolution of Assemblies can be judicially reversed.

5. Operative Constitutional Text

(1) If the President, on receipt of a report from the Governor of a State or otherwise, is satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the government of the State cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution, the President may by Proclamation— (a) assume to himself all or any of the functions of the Government of the State and all or any of the powers vested in or exercisable by the Governor or any body or authority in the State other than the Legislature of the State; (b) declare that the powers of the Legislature of the State shall be exercisable by or under the authority of Parliament; (c) make such incidental and consequential provisions as appear to the President to be necessary or desirable for giving effect to the objects of the Proclamation, including provisions for suspending in whole or in part the operation of any provisions of this Constitution relating to any body or authority in the State: Provided that nothing in this clause shall authorise the President to assume to himself any of the powers vested in or exercisable by a High Court, or to suspend in whole or in part the operation of any provision of this Constitution relating to High Courts. (2) Any such Proclamation may be revoked or varied by a subsequent Proclamation. (3) Every Proclamation under this article shall be laid before each House of Parliament and shall, except where it is a Proclamation revoking a previous Proclamation, cease to operate at the expiration of two months unless before the expiration of that period it has been approved by resolutions of both Houses of Parliament: Provided that if any such Proclamation (not being a Proclamation revoking a previous Proclamation) is issued at a time when the House of the People is dissolved or the dissolution of the House of the People takes place during the period of two months referred to in this clause, and if a resolution approving the Proclamation has been passed by the Council of States, but no resolution with respect to such Proclamation has been passed by the House of the People before the expiration of that period, the Proclamation shall cease to operate at the expiration of thirty days from the date on which the House of the People first sits after its reconstitution unless before the expiration of the said period of thirty days a resolution approving the Proclamation has been also passed by the House of the People. (4) A Proclamation so approved shall, unless revoked, cease to operate on the expiration of a period of six months from the date of issue of the Proclamation: Provided that if and so often as a resolution approving the continuance in force of such a Proclamation is passed by both Houses of Parliament the Proclamation shall, unless revoked, continue in force for a further period of six months from the date on which it would otherwise have ceased to operate under this clause: Provided further that no such Proclamation shall in any case remain in force for more than three years: Provided also that for the purpose of the approval of a resolution under this clause by both Houses of Parliament, if the dissolution of the House of the People takes place during any such period of six months and a resolution approving the continuance in force of such Proclamation has been passed by the Council of States, but no resolution with respect to the continuance in force of such Proclamation has been passed by the House of the People during the said period, the Proclamation shall cease to operate at the expiration of thirty days from the date on which the House of the People first sits after its reconstitution unless before the expiration of the said period of thirty days a resolution approving the continuance in force of the Proclamation has been also passed by the House of the People. (5) Notwithstanding anything contained in clause (4), a resolution with respect to the continuance in force of a Proclamation approved under clause (3) for any period beyond the expiration of one year from the date of issue of such Proclamation shall not be passed by either House of Parliament unless— (a) a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation, in the whole of India or, as the case may be, in the whole or any part of the State, at the time of the passing of such resolution, and (b) the Election Commission certifies that the continuance in force of the Proclamation approved under clause (3) during the period specified in such resolution is necessary on account of difficulties in holding general elections to the Legislative Assembly of the State concerned.
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part XVIII, Article 356, printed pages 211–214 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: