Skip to main content

Article 359A

Special Emergency Provisions for Punjab (Omitted)

Official heading: “[Application of this Part to the State of Punjab.]”

Historical / Omitted Provision

Inserted by the Constitution (Fifty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1988 to deal with severe terrorist violence in Punjab. The amendment temporarily permitted a National Emergency to be declared in Punjab on grounds of "internal disturbance" (which had been abolished by the 44th Amendment) and allowed suspension of Article 21 in that State. Following strong democratic objections and an improved political climate, the Constitution (Sixty-third Amendment) Act, 1989 repealed the Fifty-ninth Amendment and formally omitted Article 359A with effect from 6 January 1990.

Amendment: Constitution (Sixty-third Amendment) Act, 1989 (s. 3)Effective Date: 06-01-1990Modern Constitutional Status: Omitted from the operative Constitution. The special constitutional provisions permitting emergency declarations in Punjab on grounds of internal disturbance were repealed, restoring uniform constitutional safeguards nationwide.
Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part XVIII, Article 359A, printed page 217
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Article 359A formerly authorized special emergency measures in Punjab, and was omitted by the Sixty-third Amendment in 1990.

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

Inserted in 1988 by the 59th Amendment, Article 359A created an exceptional emergency regime exclusively for the State of Punjab during intense militancy.

It attempted to revive the ground of "internal disturbance" and dilute the safeguards introduced by the 44th Amendment, raising serious human rights concerns.

Recognizing the danger of creating regional exceptions to basic liberty guarantees, Parliament enacted the Constitution (Sixty-third Amendment) Act, 1989, which repealed the 59th Amendment and omitted Article 359A in its entirety.

As a result, the non-derogability of Article 21 and the national standards of Article 352 remain uniform throughout every State of the Union.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

A state faces severe insurgent violence, and officials discuss whether exceptional regional emergency powers can be declared.

Core takeaway: Because Article 359A was omitted, no regional dilution of Article 21 exists under the Constitution; national emergency safeguards apply uniformly everywhere.
Illustrative Notice: The provision stands omitted; emergency proclamations must strictly satisfy general Article 352 criteria.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 359A represents a repealed historical chapter reinforcing the indivisibility of basic constitutional protections.

  • Fifty-ninth Amendment origin: Enacted in 1988 for anti-terror operations in Punjab.
  • Sixty-third Amendment omission: Fully repealed with effect from 6 January 1990.
  • Uniform protection: Re-established that the right to life under Article 21 cannot be suspended in any State.

5. Historical constitutional wording — not operative

[Application of this Part to the State of Punjab.]—Omitted by the Constitution (Sixty-third Amendment) Act, 1989, s. 3 (w.e.f. 6-1-1990).
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part XVIII, Article 359A, printed page 217 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: