Skip to main content

Article 362

Privileges of Former Rulers of Indian States (Omitted)

Official heading: “[Rights and privileges of Rulers of Indian States.]”

Historical / Omitted Provision

At constitutional commencement in 1950, Article 362 directed Parliament and State Legislatures to have due regard to the personal rights, privileges, and dignities guaranteed to former princely rulers under accession covenants. As part of democratic egalitarian reforms, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government enacted the Twenty-sixth Amendment in 1971, which formally abolished privy purses (Article 363A) and omitted Article 362.

Amendment: Constitution (Twenty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1971 (s. 2)Effective Date: 28-12-1971Modern Constitutional Status: Omitted from the operative Constitution. Special personal rights, customs exemptions, and constitutional privileges of former princely rulers were abolished in 1971, establishing complete equality before the law.
Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part XIX, Article 362, printed page 221
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Article 362 formerly directed legislatures to respect personal privileges of former princely rulers, and was omitted in 1971.

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

In 1950, Article 362 preserved the customary personal privileges, titles, gun salutes, and tax exemptions of former rulers of Indian princely states.

As India’s democratic consciousness matured, these inherited monarchical privileges were recognized as incompatible with republican equality and Article 14.

The Constitution (Twenty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1971 omitted Article 362 in its entirety, extinguishing all special legal statuses for former rulers and establishing uniform civic equality.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

A descendant of a former princely ruler claims exemption from local property taxes citing historical accession covenants.

Core takeaway: Because Article 362 was omitted by the 26th Amendment, former rulers hold no special constitutional exemptions and are treated identically to all other citizens.
Illustrative Notice: The historical article stands omitted; no princely tax exemptions or legal privileges exist today.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 362 reflects the transition from princely privileges to constitutional egalitarianism.

  • Historical origin: Preserved personal privileges agreed during the 1947–1949 integration of princely states.
  • Twenty-sixth Amendment abolition: Omitted on 28 December 1971 alongside the abolition of privy purses.
  • Affirmation of equality: Reinforced that all Indian citizens, regardless of aristocratic lineage, stand equal before the law.

5. Historical constitutional wording — not operative

[Rights and privileges of Rulers of Indian States.]—Omitted by the Constitution (Twenty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1971, s. 2 (w.e.f. 28-12-1971).
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part XIX, Article 362, printed page 221 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: