Skip to main content

Article 92

Presiding Officer Barred from Chair During Own Removal Resolution

Official heading: “The Chairman or the Deputy Chairman not to preside while a resolution for his removal from office is under consideration”

Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part V, Article 92, printed pages 41–42
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Article 92 bars the Chairman or Deputy Chairman from presiding over Rajya Sabha while a resolution for their removal is under consideration, giving the Chairman a right to speak but no vote.

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

Article 92 enforces the fundamental principle of natural justice: no one should be a judge in their own cause (nemo judex in causa sua).

Clause (1) provides that at any sitting of the Council of States, while a resolution for the removal of the Vice-President (Chairman) is under consideration, the Chairman cannot preside, even if present. Similarly, the Deputy Chairman cannot preside while a resolution for their own removal is under consideration.

Clause (2) outlines speaking and voting rights during removal proceedings: the Chairman has the right to speak and take part in the proceedings to defend themselves. However, because the Chairman is not an elected member of the House, they are not entitled to vote on the removal resolution or any other matter, even in the case of a tie.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

A motion for the removal of the Vice-President is listed for discussion on the Rajya Sabha order paper.

Core takeaway: Under Article 92(1), the Vice-President cannot take the presiding chair; the Deputy Chairman or an authorized presiding officer takes the chair.
Illustrative Notice: The Vice-President may sit on the floor of the House and speak in their defense, but cannot cast any vote on the resolution.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 92 guarantees procedural impartiality during removal proceedings in the Rajya Sabha.

  • Mandatory disqualification from presiding during personal removal motions.
  • Upholds natural justice by barring self-adjudication from the Chair.
  • Right of defense: Chairman may speak and present arguments.
  • Voting exclusion: Chairman has zero voting entitlement during removal proceedings.

5. Operative Constitutional Text

(1) At any sitting of the Council of States, while any resolution for the removal of the Vice-President from his office is under consideration, the Chairman, or while any resolution for the removal of the Deputy Chairman from his office is under consideration, the Deputy Chairman, shall not, though he is present, preside, and the provisions of clause (2) of article 91 shall apply in relation to every such sitting as they apply in relation to a sitting from which the Chairman, or, as the case may be, the Deputy Chairman, is absent. (2) The Chairman shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, the Council of States while any resolution for the removal of the Vice-President from his office is under consideration in the Council, but, notwithstanding anything in article 100, shall not be entitled to vote at all on such resolution or on any other matter during such proceedings.
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part V, Article 92, printed pages 41–42 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: