Skip to main content

Article 128

Attendance of Retired Judges at Supreme Court Sittings

Official heading: “Attendance of retired Judges at sittings of the Supreme Court”

Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part V, Article 128, printed pages 60–61
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Article 128 enables the Chief Justice of India, with presidential consent, to request a retired Supreme Court or High Court Judge to sit and act as a Judge of the Supreme Court.

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

Article 128 provides a practical mechanism to leverage the experience of retired judges to clear extraordinary backlogs or assist in complex matters.

The Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme Court, Federal Court, or a qualified High Court Judge to sit and act as a Judge of the Supreme Court.

Under the Proviso, no retired judge is compelled to serve; the appointment requires the voluntary consent of the retired judge.

While so sitting and acting, the retired judge is entitled to allowances determined by the President and possesses all the jurisdiction, powers, and privileges of a Supreme Court Judge, but is not otherwise deemed to be a permanent Judge of that Court.

Note on NJAC Text: The 99th Amendment text is printed in official editions, but the strike-down in SCAORA (2015) revived the pre-amendment CJI-led request process.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

A massive accumulation of pending specialized tax and corporate appeals requires experienced judicial hands for a targeted three-month disposal drive.

Core takeaway: The CJI, with presidential approval, invites a respected retired Supreme Court judge to sit and hear appeals under Article 128.
Illustrative Notice: The retired judge must personally consent to the request; service cannot be constitutionally compelled.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 128 allows the Supreme Court to enlist experienced retired jurists to manage exceptional caseloads.

  • CJI initiates request with presidential consent.
  • Mandatory consent of the retired judge.
  • Full powers, privileges, and jurisdiction of a sitting Supreme Court judge while acting.
  • Does not alter permanent court seniority or retirement status.

5. Operative Constitutional Text

Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person who has held the office of a Judge of the Supreme Court or of the Federal Court or who has held the office of a Judge of a High Court and is duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to sit and act as a Judge of the Supreme Court, and every such person so requested shall, while so sitting and acting, be entitled to such allowances as the President may by order determine and have all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges of, but shall not otherwise be deemed to be, a Judge of that Court: Provided that nothing in this article shall be deemed to require any such person as aforesaid to sit and act as a Judge of that Court unless he consents so to do.
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part V, Article 128, printed pages 60–61 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: