Skip to main content

Article 226A

Constitutional Validity of Central Laws (Repealed)

Official heading: “Constitutional validity of Central laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 226.].”

Historical / Omitted Provision

Inserted during the Emergency by the 42nd Amendment (1976) to shield Central statutes from High Court scrutiny; repealed by the post-Emergency 43rd Amendment (1977).

Amendment: Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977 Effective Date: 13-04-1978Modern Constitutional Status: Omitted from the operative Constitution. High Courts possess full jurisdiction to examine the constitutional validity of both Central and State laws under Article 226.
Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part VI, Article 226A, printed page 105
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Article 226A, inserted by the 42nd Amendment (1976) to bar High Courts from considering the constitutional validity of Central laws, was repealed by the 43rd Amendment (1977).

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

Article 226A was enacted during the Emergency by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, as part of an attempt to curtail the judicial review powers of State High Courts.

The provision expressly prohibited High Courts from considering the constitutional validity of any Central law in proceedings under Article 226, forcing all federal challenges to be taken exclusively to the Supreme Court.

Constitutional Restoration: Following the revocation of Emergency, the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, repealed Article 226A in its entirety (w.e.f. 13 April 1978), fully restoring the comprehensive writ jurisdiction of High Courts over both Union and State enactments.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

A litigant challenges a Union tax statute in the Madras High Court on the ground that it violates fundamental rights under Article 14.

Core takeaway: Under the restored constitutional framework following the repeal of Article 226A, the High Court has full jurisdiction to adjudicate the validity of Central laws.
Illustrative Notice: Article 226A is an omitted historical provision and has no operative legal force today.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 226A represents a repealed constitutional restriction demonstrating the restoration of judicial review.

  • Inserted by 42nd Amendment (1976) during the Emergency.
  • Barred High Courts from reviewing the constitutional validity of Central legislation.
  • Repealed by 43rd Amendment (1977) to restore full High Court judicial review.
  • Retained in official editions as an omitted historical entry.

5. Historical constitutional wording — not operative

Constitutional validity of Central laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 226.—Omitted by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 8 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part VI, Article 226A, printed page 105 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: