Skip to main content

Article 278

Financial Agreements with Part B States (Omitted)

Official heading: “Agreement with States in Part B of the First Schedule with regard to certain financial matters”

Historical / Omitted Provision

Article 278 originally authorized the Government of India to enter into ten-year financial agreements with Part B States (former princely states and unions) regarding the levy, collection, and sharing of taxes and transitional financial assistance. Following the reorganization of States and the elimination of the distinction between Part A and Part B States under the Seventh Amendment in 1956, Article 278 was formally omitted.

Amendment: Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956 (s. 29 and Sch.)Effective Date: 01-11-1956Modern Constitutional Status: Omitted from the operative Constitution. The separate financial agreements and revenue integration pacts with Part B States were abolished in 1956 upon state unification.
Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part XII, Article 278, printed page 164
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Article 278 formerly authorized transitional financial agreements with Part B princely states, and was omitted in 1956 upon state reorganization.

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

In 1950, integrating the finances of former princely states (Part B States like Mysore, Rajasthan, and Patiala) with the rest of India was a delicate transitional operation.

Article 278 empowered the Government of India to enter into special bilateral financial agreements with Part B States for up to ten years to manage tax integration, subsidies, and revenue sharing.

Once linguistic state reorganization took effect under the Seventh Amendment in 1956 and the distinction between Part A and Part B States was abolished, Article 278 became obsolete and was formally omitted from the Constitution.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

A researcher reviews the financial integration documents of the Rajasthan or Travancore-Cochin unions between 1950 and 1956.

Core takeaway: Article 278 was the constitutional vehicle for those federal-princely financial agreements until their unification under the 7th Amendment.
Illustrative Notice: Since 1956, all Indian States operate under the uniform financial rules of Articles 270 and 275 without separate bilateral financial treaties.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 278 was a transitional financial provision for princely integration.

  • Transitional agreements: Covered federal-princely financial integration between 1950 and 1956.
  • Omitted in 1956: Deleted by the Seventh Amendment.
  • Fiscal harmonization: Unified all Indian States under standard constitutional financial provisions.

5. Historical constitutional wording — not operative

[278. Agreement with States in Part B of the First Schedule with regard to certain financial matters.—Omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).]
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part XII, Article 278, printed page 164 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: