Skip to main content

Article 300A

Constitutional Right to Property

Official heading: “Persons not to be deprived of property save by authority of law”

Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part XII, Article 300A, printed page 175
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Guarantees that no person shall be deprived of their property except by the authority of a valid statute enacted by a competent legislature.

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

Inserted by the Forty-fourth Constitutional Amendment in 1978, Article 300A established the modern legal status of the right to property in India.

Originally, the right to property was a Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(f) and Article 31. Because extensive property litigation delayed land reforms and nationalization, the 44th Amendment repealed both provisions and re-enacted Article 300A as a standalone constitutional right in Part XII.

While no longer a Part III Fundamental Right, Article 300A is a vital constitutional and human right. The executive cannot seize, acquire, or demolish private property by administrative decree, circular, or executive order; it requires an express, valid statute enacted by a competent legislature.

In landmark rulings such as K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Karnataka (2011), Vidya Devi v. State of H.P. (2020), and Hari Krishna Mandir Trust v. State of Maharashtra (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that any law depriving a person of property must satisfy three cardinal tests: (1) competent legislative authority; (2) a genuine public purpose; and (3) fair compensation or procedural justice.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

A municipal corporation or state road agency uses bulldozers to demolish a citizen’s boundary wall or widen a highway across private land without initiating formal statutory acquisition proceedings or paying compensation.

Core takeaway: Under Article 300A, the state’s action is illegal, ultra vires, and unconstitutional; no person can be dispossessed of property without formal statutory process and authority of law.
Illustrative Notice: Unlike under the original Article 31, property owners cannot challenge statutory compensation amounts as inadequate under Article 32, but they can enforce fair acquisition under Article 226.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 300A safeguards private property from arbitrary state expropriation.

  • Constitutional human right: Though removed from Part III, it remains a robust constitutional guarantee.
  • Strict legislative mandate: Deprivation requires an enacted statute; executive fiat or police action is strictly void.
  • Inbuilt compensation and public purpose: The Supreme Court reads public purpose and just compensation into statutory expropriation.

5. Operative Constitutional Text

No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part XII, Article 300A, printed page 175 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: