Skip to main content

Article 335

Balancing SC/ST Public Employment Claims with Administrative Efficiency

Official heading: “Claims of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to services and posts”

Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part XVI, Article 335, printed pages 193–194
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Requires the claims of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to public service posts to be considered consistently with the maintenance of administrative efficiency.

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

Article 335 guides affirmative action in public employment, directing that claims of SC and ST members shall be taken into consideration in civil service appointments, consistently with maintaining efficiency of administration.

In early decisions such as S. Vinod Kumar (1996), courts interpreted "efficiency" as barring relaxation of qualifying exam marks in promotional evaluations.

To nullify those restrictive rulings, Parliament enacted the Constitution (Eighty-second Amendment) Act, 2000, adding a crucial proviso.

The proviso explicitly empowers the State to relax qualifying marks in examinations or lower evaluation standards for reservation in promotions to any public services or posts under the Union or States.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

A government department lowers the promotional examination cutoff score by 5% for SC and ST candidates to ensure adequate representation in supervisory engineering cadres.

Core takeaway: Under the proviso to Article 335 (added by the 82nd Amendment), such relaxation of evaluation standards is constitutionally protected.
Illustrative Notice: The relaxing measure must still be reasonable and not compromise the core functioning or basic competence of public administration.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 335 harmonizes affirmative action in public services with governance efficacy.

  • Constitutional balance: Balances social justice representation with the overarching imperative of administrative efficacy.
  • Eighty-second Amendment proviso: Authorizes the State to lower qualifying standards or benchmark marks in promotional examinations.
  • Harmonized with Article 16: Works in tandem with Articles 16(4), 16(4A), and 16(4B) to support public employment quotas.

5. Operative Constitutional Text

The claims of the members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes shall be taken into consideration, consistently with the maintenance of efficiency of administration, in the making of appointments to services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union or of a State: Provided that nothing in this article shall prevent in making of any provision in favour of the members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes for relaxation in qualifying marks in any examination or lowering the standards of evaluation, for reservation in matters or promotion to any class or classes of services or posts in connection with the affairs of the Union or of a State.
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part XVI, Article 335, printed pages 193–194 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: