Skip to main content

Article 389

Pending Bills at Constitutional Commencement (Omitted)

Official heading: “[Provision as to Bills pending in the Dominion Legislatures and in the Legislatures of Provinces and Indian States.]”

Historical / Omitted Provision

Article 389 provided that bills pending in the Dominion Legislature or provincial legislatures immediately before 26 January 1950 did not lapse, but were transferred to the Provisional Parliament or provisional state legislatures. It was omitted by the Seventh Amendment in 1956.

Amendment: Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956 (s. 29 and Sch.)Effective Date: 01-11-1956Modern Constitutional Status: Omitted from the operative Constitution. Prevented pending legislative bills from lapsing on 26 January 1950, allowing them to be considered by the Provisional Parliament and state assemblies.
Check this article against the official editionAwaiting human legal review
Source edition
The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)
Source locator
Part XXI, Article 389, printed page 251
Last human source-link check
Not yet checked
Last human legal review
Not yet reviewed

AI-assisted source comparisons are noted with the citations below; the check date remains pending until a human confirms the link. The report link opens your email app; you choose whether to send it.

1. In One Sentence

Article 389 formerly preserved pending legislative bills across the 1950 transition, and was omitted in 1956.

2. What It Means in Everyday Language

Article 389 prevented unfinished legislation from lapsing when the Constitution commenced.

Bills introduced before 26 January 1950 could be taken up by the Provisional Parliament or state legislatures.

The article was omitted by the Seventh Amendment in 1956.

3. Practical Illustrative Example

Everyday Scenario:

A labor regulation bill introduced in the Dominion Legislature in late 1949 was taken up and passed by the Provisional Parliament in early 1950 under Article 389.

Core takeaway: Article 389 preserved legislative work across the constitutional transition.
Illustrative Notice: The article is omitted; modern bill lapses are governed by Articles 107 and 196.

4. Important Limits, Qualifications & Exceptions

Article 389 provided continuity for pending legislative business in 1950.

  • Non-lapsing rule: Prevented pre-1950 bills from expiring upon constitutional commencement.
  • Omitted in 1956: Repealed by the Seventh Amendment.
  • Replaced by constitutional bill rules: Articles 107 and 196 govern contemporary lapses.

5. Historical constitutional wording — not operative

[Provision as to Bills pending in the Dominion Legislatures and in the Legislatures of Provinces and Indian States.]—Omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).
Transcription for reference; compare with the linked official editionNot yet verified by a human legal reviewer

6. Sources & Historical Assembly Deliberations

Assembly quotations are withheld until wording, dates, and attribution have been checked against the primary record.

Sources & Citation Metadata
  • •
    Constitutional TextThe Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2026)Cited PDF page
    Government of India (Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice) • Part XXI, Article 389, printed page 251 • Human source-link check pending

    Primary PDF accessed and transcribed with AI assistance on 14 October 2026. Formatting and amendment annotation markers are omitted; operative wording is retained. This is not human legal review. Later amendments and commencement notifications have not been comprehensively checked.

Human legal review is pending; compare the text with the cited editionNon-partisan educational resource

Related Constitutional Articles to Explore: